CoreWeb
Fewer tools
usually the answer
Integration
where value actually is
Contradiction
the symptom to look for

MarTech Consulting

Most marketing stacks accumulate rather than get designed. Six tools with overlapping functions, three sources of truth that disagree, and an annual licence bill nobody has audited since the person who bought it left.

MarTech & Analytics

The measurement layer. Usually the first thing that needs fixing.

Direction
We usually recommend buying less.

Consolidation beats acquisition

The typical engagement here ends with fewer tools rather than more. Overlapping platforms, licences for products nobody has logged into in a year, and two systems both claiming to be the customer record while disagreeing about who your customers are.

The value is rarely in a new platform. It is in integration — getting the systems you already pay for to share data reliably, so campaign, analytics and CRM figures reconcile. When those three disagree, the resulting meetings are about whose number is right rather than what to do.

This is unfashionable consulting, since there is no implementation project at the end of it. It is also usually where the money is.

8 areas
One body of work, not a menu.

All services

What’s included

Stack audit

Inventory of tools, licence costs, actual usage and functional overlap. Frequently the first time anyone has assembled this.

Data flow mapping

Where data originates, where it goes, where it gets transformed and where it diverges — which is where reconciliation problems live.

Tool selection

Requirements-led evaluation where a genuine gap exists, including the option of not buying anything.

Integration design

Getting existing systems to share data reliably, which is where most of the available value sits.

Tag management

Clean container governance, since tag managers accumulate abandoned tags that slow every page.

Consent and privacy architecture

Consent capture flowing correctly through to every downstream system, which is commonly broken.

Reconciliation

Establishing why your platforms disagree and which should be authoritative for what.

Governance

Ownership, naming conventions and documentation, so the stack does not re-accumulate within two years.

Common questions
Asked on most first calls.

Questions

Will you recommend we buy more tools?

Usually the opposite. Most stacks we audit have redundant licences and integration gaps. Buying another platform to solve an integration problem tends to add a third source of truth.

Are you a reseller for any platform?

No. We take no vendor commissions, which is why we can recommend keeping what you have.

Why do our platforms report different numbers?

Different attribution models, different session definitions, different data collection points, and frequently a genuine tracking fault. Some divergence is expected; a large gap is a problem.

Do we need a CDP?

Fewer companies than are sold one. It solves a real problem at meaningful cost and complexity. See CDP services for when it is justified.

How long does an audit take?

Three to five weeks for most stacks, depending on size and how much documentation exists. Usually very little exists.

Next step
We look at your site before the call.

Start with a free audit

An automated crawl plus a 30-minute walkthrough of what we can see from outside your site. If what you need isn’t something we do well, we’ll tell you.